The clear answer depends greatly on organizational tradition and laws that are national
When a senior person in a business has intercourse with a member that is junior exactly what should that organization do?
- Boeing CEO Harry Stonecipher had been obligated to resign in 2005 ten times following the Board of Directors learned which he had a consensual affair with the pinnacle associated with business’s Washington workplace. He had gone back to the business after procurement scandals had resulted in the resignation of this previous CEO. But their activities that are sexual deemed inconsistent along with his push for higher criteria of conduct and seen as embarrassing to your business as a result of steamy e-mails. (in accordance with news reports, Strauss-Kahn utilized intimate language in the economist to his communications.)
- In america army, fraternization rules embodied in the Uniform of Military Justice flatly prohibit an officer from having intimate relationships with an member that is enlisted.
- Based on an account when you look at the nyc occasions, the “IMF keeps a far more stance that is permissive towards superior-subordinate intercourse, that do not, per se, constitute harassment. But “the global world Bank, by comparison, states such a relationship is ‘a de facto conflict of great interest.'”
Within the factually similar cases of Strauss-Kahn in the IMF and Stonecipher at Boeing (hitched males, consensual intercourse, steamy communications), the “fraternization” email address details are totally opposing.